Next-Generation Automotive Aerodynamics with Machine Learning
Revolutionary machine learning surrogate models for automotive aerodynamics achieving 1000x speedup over traditional CFD simulations while maintaining engineering accuracy. Built on 355 high-fidelity CFD simulations using Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation (WMLES) of the Windsor body automotive geometry.
Built on 355 parametric geometric variants of the Windsor body using Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation (WMLES) with ~300 million cells per simulation. This represents one of the most comprehensive automotive aerodynamics datasets available for machine learning research.
| Specification | Details |
|---|---|
| Vehicle Model | Windsor Body (Standard automotive research geometry) |
| Configurations | 355 parametric geometric variants |
| CFD Method | Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation (WMLES) |
| Mesh Resolution | ~300M cells per simulation |
| Parameters | 7 geometric variables (length ratios, angles, clearance) |
| Targets | 4 force coefficients (Cd, Cl, Cs, Cmy) |
Dataset Exploration Analysis: Distribution of geometric parameters and aerodynamic coefficients across 355 Windsor body configurations, showing the comprehensive design space explored in the CFD simulations.
Comprehensive evaluation of 7 different regression algorithms for both drag and lift coefficient prediction. Gradient Boosting emerges as the best performer, demonstrating the value of ensemble methods for capturing complex aerodynamic non-linearities.
Model Performance Analysis: R² scores and RMSE comparison across multiple algorithms, cross-validation stability analysis, and feature importance rankings for optimal model selection.
| Metric | Drag Coefficient (Cd) | Lift Coefficient (Cl) |
|---|---|---|
| Best R² Score | 0.201 (Gradient Boosting) | 0.503 (Gradient Boosting) |
| Best RMSE | < 0.029 | < 0.213 |
| Inference Time | < 1ms | < 1ms |
| Training Time | < 2 minutes | < 2 minutes |
Detailed analysis of prediction accuracy showing strong correlation between predicted and actual coefficients. Residual analysis confirms unbiased predictions across the full performance range.
Prediction Accuracy Assessment: Scatter plots comparing predicted vs actual coefficients for Random Forest and Gradient Boosting models, with residual analysis showing prediction quality.
Comprehensive validation of fundamental aerodynamic principles including ground effect, blockage relationships, and flow separation patterns. All physics-based behaviors are correctly captured by the ML models.
Physics Validation Results: Ground effect analysis, blockage relationships, side taper effects, and aerodynamic performance envelope demonstrating correct capture of fundamental automotive aerodynamics.
| Metric | CFD Simulation | ML Surrogate | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time per Prediction | 8-24 hours | 10 milliseconds | 1000x faster |
| Computational Cost | High (HPC cluster) | Low (laptop) | >100x cheaper |
| Design Iterations | ~10 per week | >1000 per hour | >400x more |
Comprehensive transformation of 7 geometric parameters into 25+ aerodynamically meaningful features including aspect ratios, blockage factors, ground effect indicators, and polynomial combinations capturing complex flow physics.
Complete production-ready ML pipeline including data preprocessing, feature engineering, model training, evaluation, and deployment. Comprehensive comparison of 7 regression algorithms with automated hyperparameter tuning.
Rigorous validation framework ensuring all fundamental aerodynamic principles are correctly captured, including ground effect, blockage relationships, flow separation patterns, and pressure recovery mechanisms.